Saturday, December 29, 2007
Friday, December 28, 2007
Lincoln Slavery Smear
Thursday, December 27, 2007
How To End The Embargo Excuse
But the gist of this new Constitutional approach is to make the regime apply for goods along with their plans for those goods. If the goods benefit the Cuban people then it would be cruel to tax such poor people so the tax would be zero. But should the goods benefit the regime top players then there would be a high tax since it would be appropriate to tax these rich people.
Naturally Raul will weep that America is meddling in Cuban affairs. But that is a silly notion. The Castro boys can and have done whatever they like for almost half a century. But the Castro boys likewise should not think that they can dictate U.S. tax policy authorized in our Constitution. That's the job of Congress. I want to lobby Congress to establish a mechanism in which the above more sensible policy can be enacted.
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
More Than Just 2 Choices
The reason the federal government of the day was so tiny is the people took responsibility for one another and wasted no time on their knees begging the federal government for "funds" stolen from other Americans by the federal government. Asking the federal government to conduct an embargo was preposterous because this power was not given to them in the Constitution. But likewise, Americans of the day would have been outraged if the federal government grabbed an unconstitutional power and made it illegal for citizens to go off to another country to fight against a despot. Sadly today, American ignorance makes many act like children with their demands and the federal government gladly treats us all like children. I don't want this federal cuddle. George Washington was absolutely correct when he said: "Government is not reason,it is not eloquence. It is force. Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
I'd like all of you to think about that before the New Year begins.
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
I Contacted Congressman Sarbanes
Just a note to let you know that I've made contact with Congressman Sarbanes about the logistics of removing the embargo and replacing it with targeted tariffs that will punish the regime but not the Cuban people. I'll keep you posted on any progress.
From Jose Reyes
No one is to say what type of reaction one would really have or would not have in this particular case presented here when reading about this unfortunate incident. As you can see by everybody's comments here, they are mixed but I respect more the ones from the Cuban exiles.
Unless one is or has been deprived of their freedom, that means, no freedom of speech, no freedom of press, no religious freedom, rationed food, no freedom to vote, no freedom of international travel out of the country and so on like Cubans in Cuba face everyday, then who else is to say how they would react. You don't know what freedom is until you lose it, remember that.
With all the "facts" I just presented here concerning the situation of "Human Rights" in Cuba, I can say that no one, in their right minds could deny my argument here, unless they side with the Castro regime, hello Walter? This is why, by definition anyone can come to the conclusion, that any Cubans "Escaping" Cuba, is a refugee, not an immigrant or neither a migrant which is the status that has been stamped on their foreheads since 1994. It used to be that if any Cuban "Fleeing" Cuba was found in International waters, they would be escorted and welcomed into the United States. It was Mr. Clinton who changed the law, since then, to be considered "Free" you would have to physically touch American soil. What's the difference? If you are in the Ocean, you are a Migrant but if you touch land then you are a refugee, absolutely ridiculous!
That brings me back to Mr. Lippman again, he failed to mention the Wet Foot/Dry Foot "Policy" that Clinton implemented. If this law did not exist, the Cubans fleeing Cuba, like in this instance would have never gone through this unfortunate disaster and smugglers would not exist, unless they were smuggling narcotics from the Castro Regime in Cuba.Yes, Mr. Lippman, the notorious American Socialist/Communist, just go to his website, same name. What kind of credibility can he have?
Thank You, Jose Reyes-Cubanology.com
Monday, December 24, 2007
Havana Journal Complains
Embargo No...Tarifas Si!
Merry Christmas Cubanos and a Happy and Free New Year
Who Wins By A Landslide?
The Impending Crash
Somebody Is Interested In This Blog
The Neutrality Act
Today everything is backwards from how the Framers of the Constitution originally intended it to be. Power and responsibility was supposed to mostly be held by individual Americans, then the local and state governments. Finally the Founders wrote a Constitution that strictly limited the role and responsibilities of the federal government. They wisely wrote the document in English so there would be no need to translate the document or "reinterpret" it as some fools and those who would undermine the Constitution assert.
Sadly during the Twentieth Century the Supreme Court was enlarged by F.D.R. and they began to reinterpret the Constitution to give the federal government all sorts of new powers and responsibilities. The justices right up to this very second for the most part try not to look at laws to see if they conflict with the very clearly written words in the Constitution. These black robed soothsayers currently believe they must peer into the past and conjure up the "intent" of the framers. In other words they are using their opinion of what they personally believe the Founding Fathers would have want done today with regard to current legal questions. But the Founding Fathers made it abundantly clear how things were to be operated in America. The vast majority of you have never given the U.S. Constitution a good reading and analyzed its meaning. I have... Basically it limits the powers of the federal government strictly. After this the Founders realized things change that they could not foresee then in Colonial times. But they said not a word about reinterpretation of the Constitution or intent. These American wise men inserted into the Constitution a process by which future Americans could "Amend" the document to address modern problems. The government Amended the Constitution to prohibit alcohol federally because they knew the federal government as things stood had no Constitutional responsibility otherwise over alcohol consumption.
Today Americans, including numerous Cubans, clamor for the federal government to take on every imaginable responsibility right down to mandating the legal toilet in an American home. Then these unenlightened Americans spend the rest of their time crying and begging to the government because they don't do things the way they wanted. But Americans originally were intended by the founders to have exactly that right - the ability to do things the way they wanted them done. That did not mean getting a big gang of apes under the power and authority of the federal government to force your neighbor to participate and fork over cash for your project, initiative or program. That was solely your responsibility along with other Americans who agreed with these plans and voluntarily joined you.
You cry out for an imperial president that will solve all of your problems. But you are never happy with what you get. You get what you deserve though. I on the other hand do not deserve this government. Sometime I feel as if the cosmos got it all wrong with Tomas Estrada-Palma. I was supposed to be born two hundred years ago or sometime in the future during an enlightened golden age - not now. I am shocked but not surprised by the degree of anger and insults directed at me and honest men like Ron Paul for just wanting to follow the rules. Neither Ron Paul nor I wrote the Constitution. But Ron Paul swore an oath to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution and he takes that oath solemnly. Cubans cry afoul about Castro ignoring the Cuban Constitution while their ignorance of the U.S. Constitution leads them at the very same moment to demand that the federal government ignore our Constitution and do their bidding. Why that's the kind of stuff that Castro does. So is shouting down discussion over topics like the embargo's Constitutionality accompanied by personal insults, insinuation and lies to smear one's character. Not directed at me fortunately but towards Ron Paul. I only have suffered the arrows of mild insinuation which will not slay me.
When I discussed this last night on my Blogtalk show my cousin originally called to talk some sense into my head about the embargo. But after hearing how we could do a more effective job overthrowing Castro following the U.S. Constitution he agreed that this would be a much better approach. Do you know what his main concern was about my proposal as was the case for my other guests? They thought Americans were too stupid and ignorant to realize how we could do this better following the Constitutional approach to defeating Castro. So for those of you for which this pertains I'm here trying to coach you up! I'm not mad at you because I, like everyone at one time have suffered from ignorance and even till this very day am unenlightened about most aspects of the universe. But I know a thing or two about the Constitution. Listen to this Blogtalkradio show from last night. I give a pretty good explanation of how defeating Castro constitutionally would be better and faster. Give this a listen if you have time. Thank you.