From Jose Reyes
My comment here will be directed towards 2 individuals, one the writer of this article and another towards Mr. Lippman. Mary Murray, your news agency along with CNN, CBS, ABC and the rest of the major media networks here and around the world are the least informed on the everyday occurrences in Cuba. Your coverage within Cuba is very limited and also your coverage is censored by the criminal, totalitarian communist Castro regime, so your information within Cuba is totally useless and undependable. Where were your writers on December 10 (International Human Rights Day), when a group of demonstrators conducted a pacifist march for "Freedom of Speech", they were disrupted, beaten and arrested by Castro's security forces, there is video available for everyone to see, if interested. Or have you heard of the "Damas de Blanco", why is there no documentation found on your news agency or the others concerning these courageous women. There are many credible and respectable Blogs and Websites that everyone here can visit and learn exactly what is taking place in Cuba every single minute.
No one is to say what type of reaction one would really have or would not have in this particular case presented here when reading about this unfortunate incident. As you can see by everybody's comments here, they are mixed but I respect more the ones from the Cuban exiles.
Unless one is or has been deprived of their freedom, that means, no freedom of speech, no freedom of press, no religious freedom, rationed food, no freedom to vote, no freedom of international travel out of the country and so on like Cubans in Cuba face everyday, then who else is to say how they would react. You don't know what freedom is until you lose it, remember that.
With all the "facts" I just presented here concerning the situation of "Human Rights" in Cuba, I can say that no one, in their right minds could deny my argument here, unless they side with the Castro regime, hello Walter? This is why, by definition anyone can come to the conclusion, that any Cubans "Escaping" Cuba, is a refugee, not an immigrant or neither a migrant which is the status that has been stamped on their foreheads since 1994. It used to be that if any Cuban "Fleeing" Cuba was found in International waters, they would be escorted and welcomed into the United States. It was Mr. Clinton who changed the law, since then, to be considered "Free" you would have to physically touch American soil. What's the difference? If you are in the Ocean, you are a Migrant but if you touch land then you are a refugee, absolutely ridiculous!
That brings me back to Mr. Lippman again, he failed to mention the Wet Foot/Dry Foot "Policy" that Clinton implemented. If this law did not exist, the Cubans fleeing Cuba, like in this instance would have never gone through this unfortunate disaster and smugglers would not exist, unless they were smuggling narcotics from the Castro Regime in Cuba.Yes, Mr. Lippman, the notorious American Socialist/Communist, just go to his website, same name. What kind of credibility can he have?
Thank You, Jose Reyes-Cubanology.com
No one is to say what type of reaction one would really have or would not have in this particular case presented here when reading about this unfortunate incident. As you can see by everybody's comments here, they are mixed but I respect more the ones from the Cuban exiles.
Unless one is or has been deprived of their freedom, that means, no freedom of speech, no freedom of press, no religious freedom, rationed food, no freedom to vote, no freedom of international travel out of the country and so on like Cubans in Cuba face everyday, then who else is to say how they would react. You don't know what freedom is until you lose it, remember that.
With all the "facts" I just presented here concerning the situation of "Human Rights" in Cuba, I can say that no one, in their right minds could deny my argument here, unless they side with the Castro regime, hello Walter? This is why, by definition anyone can come to the conclusion, that any Cubans "Escaping" Cuba, is a refugee, not an immigrant or neither a migrant which is the status that has been stamped on their foreheads since 1994. It used to be that if any Cuban "Fleeing" Cuba was found in International waters, they would be escorted and welcomed into the United States. It was Mr. Clinton who changed the law, since then, to be considered "Free" you would have to physically touch American soil. What's the difference? If you are in the Ocean, you are a Migrant but if you touch land then you are a refugee, absolutely ridiculous!
That brings me back to Mr. Lippman again, he failed to mention the Wet Foot/Dry Foot "Policy" that Clinton implemented. If this law did not exist, the Cubans fleeing Cuba, like in this instance would have never gone through this unfortunate disaster and smugglers would not exist, unless they were smuggling narcotics from the Castro Regime in Cuba.Yes, Mr. Lippman, the notorious American Socialist/Communist, just go to his website, same name. What kind of credibility can he have?
Thank You, Jose Reyes-Cubanology.com
posted by Tomás Estrada-Palma at
6:43 AM
1 Comments:
These media outlets who ape Castro line while ignoring us will soon be on the outside looking in. We will be very careful and selective about who gets press credentials in the new Cuba. The America networks like NBC will not be provided press credentials so they will have to get information from reliable media outlets who will be given press credentials. NBC will not be given any access to the new democratic Cuban government and people like Matt Liar will not be permitted to travel to Cuba. We mean business!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home