My Fellow Animals!

This is absolutely incredible! Did you know in Maryland statute §5–101 it reads:

(m) (1) “Drug” means:

(i) a substance recognized in the official United States Pharmacopoeia, official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official National Formulary;

(ii) a substance intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in humans or other animals;

(iii) except for food, a substance intended to affect the structure or function of the body of humans or other animals; or

(iv) a substance intended for use as a component of any substance specified in item (i), (ii), or (iii) of this paragraph.

I made the important parts big so you can't miss them. My hat's off to Alfred Adask, Alex Jones and infowars.com for bringing this to my attention. You see amigos the Constitution guarantees me the right to freedom of religion. My beliefs as well as those of Christians, Jews and many others is that we are humans and have rights not granted to animals. The statute does not say humans "and" other animals. It says humans "or" other animals. The entire basis of all drug law across the entire United States is completely unconstitutional as it stands. I AM NOT AN ANIMAL!!!

So anyone in Maryland can use this religious defense if charged with a drug violation. So far prosecutors have dropped charges when this defense has been deployed. Their only other avenue is to argue in Court that the offender IS in fact an animal and therefore not a human. This prosecutor approach was used extensively with black slaves before the civil war. How stupid would a prosecutor look doing this before a judge who would have to agree that the offender WAS indeed an animal violating the statute in order to be convicted.