Stealing Elections Via Computer

The analysis of the difference between the hand count and the computer counted ballots in New Hampshire demonstrates who the neocon elite have chosen for your next president. Romney on the right and Hilliary on the left. How do I know that?

First the neocons do their preliminary polling to establish who to steal votes from electronically during the Primary state elections. The trick is to do it across the board taking votes from the candidates you do not want to win and giving those votes to the chosen candidate. It appears McCain, Hucklebee and Ron Paul had the most votes stolen from them then transfered using software code to the neocon candidate of choice - Romney. From the pattern it appears the software program subtracted the first votes of the preferred losers then added them to the preferred winner. Thereafter a vote could be stolen and added to the preferred candidate's total every so many votes, in both cases based on a guess as to how many votes the candidates would actually get. So Ron Paul actually beat Rudy.

But stealing an election is not an exact science. The software programmer who wrote the code to perpetrate this election fraud is not very good or there would not have been precincts that polled zero votes for Ron Paul. The election authorities have already admitted that was wrong. What this showed is the neocons feared Ron Paul would do even better than he did because they stole more votes than necessary to accomplish their goals.

So voters need to sign up outside of the polls to enumerate for whom they voted so that this total can be compared with the computer generated numbers. This is especially so in counties like mine that use touchscreen voting with no paper ballot at all. There is no way to do a recount in my county. Those responsible for this voting machine travesty should be run out of office at the first possible opportunity.